JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 15, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Chica Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-476/98.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó la petición de aclaración presentada por el apoderado de la demandada en el proceso de la referencia, toda vez que le corresponde conocerla y definirla a la justicia ordinaria, pues la tutela es una acción que consagra el Art. 86 de la C.P., para proteger los derechos fundamentales de las personas, de lesiones o amenazas de vulneración por parte de una autoridad pública y, bajo ciertos supuestos, por parte de un particular, siendo entonces un procedimiento judicial autónomo, directo y sumario, que en ningún caso puede sustituir los procesos judiciales que establece la ley, pues dicha acción no es una institución procesal alternativa ni supletiva.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. Negar la petición de aclaración presentada por el apoderado de la demandada en el proceso de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.